Quality film is at last stepping into the limelight. Online distribution is the key that will enable you and me to watch the films we enjoy – when and how we want. The Future is On Demand.
Film consumption and production are both at an all-time high, while advancements in digital media technology are opening up new distribution opportunities for the film industry. The dynamic nature of film and communications as socio political forces has made them central tools within the context of cultural politics as means of shaping national identity. A close scrutiny and understanding of the changes regarding conditions of distribution within the film industry is in light of this essential.
As the audience grows, so do the demands for high-quality film. Audiences’ increased knowledge of the vocabulary of the cinematic language also means that they are becoming more proficient at searching out films catering to their individual tastes. Do increased production, distribution and consumption necessarily mean better films? While it’s difficult to give a clear-cut answer, an increase in output should surely mean a greater variety of high-quality films.
Let us for a moment hypothesise that the growth in output is matched by a rise in quality. Then why are the repertoires of cinemas in European capitals marked by such homogeneity? The supremacy of Hollywood cinema is unquestionable; at best local national cinema gets the occasional slot. It is a well-known fact that the percentage of national produced features of European Union countries gaining distribution outside the European borders is as low as 10 %. The corresponding figure for American produced cinema is 90 %. A quick glance at the repertoires of Stockholm’s cinemas reveals that out of 33 films, 19 are American titles.
Even though the foothold of quality films on the theatrical circuit is at best capricious, it is encouragingly enough gaining ground through alternative avenues of distribution. Indie cinema has for many years dominated the Academy Awards, while film festivals are multiplying at a remarkable rate and TV-channels exclusively dedicated to quality films, such as Sundance Channel in the USA and Silver in Northern Europe, are gaining popularity.
In today’s differentiated digital media landscape the audience is faced with a plethora of choices regarding spectatorship. Opportunities for quality films with a low commercial potential to reach a wide audience should consequently be greater than ever.
One avenue in which to increase accessibility is to cut links in the chain of distribution. The creation of regional or global On Demand services could very well offer a way to radically revolutionise the conditions of distribution. Content aggregators are a reality offering producers the potential to make films instantly accessible to millions of cineastes. The only thing standing in the way of this evolution on a large scale is traditional thinking and a reliance on established industry networks.
Examples of already existing platforms for online distribution are plentiful on both sides of the Atlantic. Through its film service, iTunes could very well change the rules of the film industry globally just as it has already done to those of the music industry. In France the distribution and production company Celluloid Dreams recently launched The Auteurs www.theauteurs.com to great success, while Swedish Voddler has an international agenda and was launched with the aim of becoming the Spotify of film. Continuing to break new digital ground Academy Award winner Steven Soderbergh premiered his latest film “The Girlfriend Experience” online prior to its limited theatrical release this year, proving that digital distribution is starting to gain a foothold even in Hollywood.
On Demand services have also become part of the world of film festivals. As the first festival in the world to do so the Stockholm International Film Festival launched Festival on Demand, and this year the initiative is expanded in collaboration with Telia, Scandinavia’s leading Tele Communications Company. Ten films from the festival program will get their Nordic premiere through Telia Digital-tv on the first day of the festival, giving Swedes across the country access to some of the festival’s finest films. http://www.stockholmfilmfestival.se/en/teliafilmaward
The project was conceived as a way to support the distribution of quality film in Sweden.
Through new technology the media landscape is opening up and a whole new set of prerequisites for the digital living room are forming – where we can easily watch the films we want unhindered by the barriers put in place by earlier systems of distribution. For once those chiefly set to benefit are small production companies, and countries lacking a major film industry. They now have the opportunity to become pioneers of the new digital frontier. Internet based distribution provide the key to unlocking the potential for national cinema to reach the audience we know is out there searching for great films beyond the multiplex-theatres. The world of online-distribution is full of acronyms – VOD, TVOD, SVOD, DTO, EST, AVOD – but don’t avoid them. They will guide you to your favourite films in the future.
Git Scheynius is Director of the Stockholm International Film Festival.
Her viewpoints are personal and should not be taken to be the viewpoints of the Film Festival.
For perspectives www.perspectives.creativescotland.org.uk
Comments
I opine that to receive the personal loans from creditors you should present a good motivation.
Hello All, I am posting this on behalf of:
Literature Forum for Scotland
International and Tourism Group
Towards a policy for promoting Scotland’s writing throughout the world
Scotland’s literature is a powerful cultural and economic asset which has relevance and resonance throughout the world. The aim of the Literature Forum’s International and Tourism Group is to make that asset accessible as widely as possible, to encourage visitors to come to Scotland to experience our literature in its own environment, and to enable the realisation of the literature sector’s full economic potential.
The recent highly successful participation of ‘Writing Scotland’ at Toronto’s International Festival of Authors (October 2009) illustrates the potential of Scottish writing to make an impact beyond these shores. ‘Writing Scotland’ was the result of an intensive, collaborative effort instigated by the Scottish Government, resourced by the government’s EXPO fund, led by the Edinburgh International Book Festival and supported by Edinburgh UNESCO City of Literature, the Association of Scottish Literary Studies, the Scottish Book Trust, the Scottish Poetry Library, Scottish PEN, the Scottish Storytelling Centre and the British Council.
IFOA’s focus on Scottish writing took place in an environment already receptive to Scottish literature in an existing context of reciprocity – Canadian literature has been regularly featured at the Edinburgh International Book Festival. It took 15 Scottish writers and two publishers to Toronto and other Ontario venues, and resulted in a widening audience for contemporary Scottish literature, and new publishing and marketing opportunities.
With this example of what can be achieved we now need to examine the essential ingredients for success at the more modest levels which are realistic in the shorter term but feed into a longer-term strategy. It is important to recognise that the factors contributing to the success of ‘Writing Scotland’ in Canada are unlikely to be replicated in other parts of the world and that the long-term promotion of Scotland’s literary assets will take time, commitment and, above all, consistent resources. This will produce real returns that will have significant benefits across a broader spectrum. We need to create an organisational and funding structure that will allow both the pro-active development of international projects and events and a coherent, effective response to opportunities as they arise.
This requires a strategic approach to international contact and the establishing of central, easy-to-access resources to support visits of Scottish writers abroad and of overseas writers to Scotland. We aim to lay the foundations for a consistent and long-term approach to promoting Scotland’s literary heritage and vibrant contemporary writing, to ensuring that it plays an active part in the presentation of Scotland as a tourist destination, and for increasing economic benefits.
An international literary strategy should include:
• Building international contacts and partnerships with relevant organisations, festivals and individuals
• Defining the key regions, cities and countries to engage with pro-actively
• Investigating and following up potential for showcasing Scottish writing overseas and in Scotland
• Integrating Scottish literature, past and present, into the promotion of Scotland as a tourist destination
• Promoting book sales, translations and rights deals
• Ensuring that literary events and connections are highlighted at local, national and international levels inside the literature and other relevant sectors
• Collaboration between literature organisations, VisitScotland and the Scottish Government
• Collaboration with other art forms
The tools required include:
• A website dedicated to ‘Writing Scotland’ to enable access to and sharing of information
• A package of promotional material for use by organisations and individuals involved in overseas visits to ensure a clear and consistent promotion of Scottish literature
• Accessible information on literature organisations, publishers, festivals and authors
• Support material for tourist outlets in Scotland
• A group encouraging and coordinating international efforts
• Consistent sources of funding
We in the literature sector already have the vision and the will to make the above happen. What is needed now is the adoption by government of a clear policy and realistic objectives.
Jenni Calder
Chair, International and Tourism Group of the Literature Forum for Scotland
10.12.09
I was a bit disturbed - but frankly not surprised - to see this online case study by the excellent Mr
David Blackie of King's Lynn of the inadequacy of
to promote Scottish courses for the arts/creative
industries. He uses Napier University to make his
point not least because the former Court Chair of
Napier University Sir Andrew Cubie used to be the
Scottish Member of The Board of Trustees of this
dreadful UK quango and the current Principal of
Napier University is the Universities UK rep on
the British Council's Education UK Partnership
Board who operate this third rate service which
embarrasingly does not succeed in finding any of
the television courses at Napier - which is of
course home to The Scottish Screen School. Oops?
http://dblackie.blogs.com/the_language_business/2009/12/education-uk-web...
They should axe British Council and redistribute the £600 million a year they get from taxpayers to the component parts of the UK. Just imagine how Crative
Scotland could transform the arts in Scotland if we/
they got even 10% of the bloated British Council's
budget to do the job properly ourselves ..........
Thanks for these recent comments, please do keep them coming. We may be drawing to the end of the ‘official’ two weeks of the International theme, but the Perspectives site remains open.
However, as far as the International strand goes, there’s much more that needs to be said and commented upon, in order to get a clearer idea of which specific areas need attention in policy development and the support structures that need to underpin that development.
So far the discussion has centred around film. Given Git’s piece that’s not surprising, but it can only form part of the picture.
Let’s remind ourselves of the headline question:
How we can we use art and culture to reflect on Scotland's place in the world?
Leaving aside specific artforms, what general principles might we want to apply to international work? What kind of headline strategy would actually be helpful to artists, organisations and Scotland itself? And who/which organisation/s should be responsible for applying that strategy?
We do also need to give a clear steer on fundamental questions like these:
• How should an international strategy intersect with Government policy? Should it even take account of Government policy, or would this force unacceptable compromises in artistic integrity?
• Do we need a 5 year strategy? Apart from a strategic and financial commitment, what might this involve?
• Let’s say we did have a 5 year strategy. How will we know it has been successful? What would be the criteria against which we might judge success?
• Can artforms be promoted homogenously, or does this need to be done in an artform specific way, reflecting the nature of the different industries and audiences?
• If international promotion is to be handled on an artform specific basis, is there any mileage in creating a common database or resource which can be accessed for information on audiences, marketing, partnerships, contacts, the media, trade fairs, festivals and so on abroad? (My point here is that very often Scottish companies working abroad are having to reinvent the wheel in terms of this kind of information, when in fact it already exists in Scotland through companies who have already worked and created relationships in specific locations.)
And - we need to hear from those who work in artforms other than film. Thanks, Marc
Git Scheynius wrote (within all double quotes):
"Film consumption and production are both at an all-time high, while advancements in digital media technology are opening up new distribution opportunities for the film industry."
(Cue Elephant Man with head-drape full of affixed industry logos...)
'I'm not a consumer, I'm a human being!'
Git, do we 'consume' art or do we enjoy it or? Does true/pure are come from 'industry'? Is it money-motivated, and, if so, (when) does greed factor in? Do you want to leverage a larger audience? Why? More exposure or money? Define 'quality' film-- for you, me, meaning, or for the size of audience.
"The dynamic nature of film and communications as socio political forces has made them central tools within the context of cultural politics as means of..."
...Social-engineering/propaganda? Combine that with money, greed, corporate industrial production and maybe a new kind of feudalism by another name and pull out a winner?
"A close scrutiny and understanding of the changes regarding conditions of distribution within the film industry is in light of this essential."
Does true art exist? Or might it only happen in small corners somewhere's, perhaps in the minds' eyes? Would most be seen as/with global-warming, filler (sugar, ice-cubes, flour, gums, stabilizers, artificial flavours and obesity "epidemics"), oil-slicks, disease, vanishing species/forests, urban sprawl/blight/uglification, and so forth?
Maybe art is some 'non-profit' and their activities, or a grandmother's wild flour/herb/veggie garden out back. And her fresh garden mint/rosemary lamb stews.
"Do increased production, distribution and consumption necessarily mean better films? While it’s difficult to give a clear-cut answer... Then why are the repertoires of cinemas in European capitals marked by such homogeneity?"
If life lost its soul/spirit/vitality, where would art go, if it 'imitated life'?
When I read 'clear-cut answer', I thought of a clear-cut forest.
"The supremacy of Hollywood cinema is unquestionable..."
?
"...at best local national cinema gets the occasional slot."
Slot? Where? Would one change their (notions of) 'copyright' or venues or apparent self-congratulatory awards ceremonies and throw them up on bit torrent? Do a 'meet the directors, cast, producers, etc.' local dinner for their audience/potential? Get tribal; create their own fan-festival; etc.? Do it while the MPAA/RIAA et al. are ostensibly busily chasing international political policy and the file-sharing set with F/A-18 Hornets and 'smart' bombs. Busy.
As for Spotify, it makes me think about it slopping food on my dinner jacket:
http://torrentfreak.com/lady-gaga-earns-slightly-more-from-spotify-than-...
Enough for my dry-cleaning bill.
To finish...
'If I own a dry-cleaning service, how might I, unbeknownst to you, 'spotify' your clothes (for profit) so that you may need my dry-cleaning services?'
IOW; can we sell you wall-to-wall carpeting and then a vacuum-cleaner when you realize you'll need one?
Would you dare to apply the above 'need-creation' concept to the way you do films? Has that already been done?
Over 4000 hits from over 60 countries on Creative Scotland's Perspectives website already you tell
us - but what is the geographical spread looking
Celtic Connections which is very impressive too?
http://www.celticconnections.com/showcasescotland
Perhaps too Creative Scotland should be working with the film crews in India who will covering the Delhi
I also do not pretend to understand the details of how 'quantitative easing' works in practice - but
instead of investing in useless bits of paper why
the film industry by instructing our state-owned banks to invest in 'Braveheart 5'? In the good old days of prudent banking RBS invested in Top Gun'?!
'Who curates and why?' is a very good question - to which we will all probably have different answers?!
I still can't get over the brass neck of British Council in trying to grab credit for 'Black Watch'
- and was both surprised, and appalled, to find a
British Quango choosing which films to show at a
'Scottish (sic) Film Week in Sweden' ...........
But moving on and gritting teeth: Brian Pendreigh's Opinion piece in The Scotsman (17 November) on the
future of Scottish Screen within the new Creative
Scotland umbrella sent me back to look again at the Hydra Report 'Scotland On Screen: The Development of the Film and Television Industry in Scotland' which was commissioned with the backing of Forsyth (Lord
Forsyth - not Bill!) and most of the industry by Kevin Kane at Scottish Enterprise who was then also Chair of The Glasgow Film Fund (which put money into 'Shallow Grave' - surely one of the finest public sector investment decisions ever?) What I noticed however in their Appendix H on Eurimages
was that the UK Government apparently withdrew its
funding contribution to that Council of Europe film
initiative around 1996 even though around a quarter of all UK-produced films had got Eurimages funding
in 1995. Does anyone know if this crazy decision was subsequently reversed? And is there perhaps a role for Creative Scotland to develop a higher Council of Europe profile for Scottish film as well as building
links with the European Investment Bank in Luxembourg who I also vaguely remember made a loan for the film industry in UK (including Scotland) in the 1990's? If the Scottish Screen production fund has been axed we surely do need to encourage Creative Scotland to find alternative revenue streams quite fast - or there may not be much to 'showcase' apart from Tartan Shorts??!
Sadly Britain is still not part of EURIMAGES and so the funidng it provides is not available to UK producers.